Computation engine failure
I'm running the latest version 2.38.3. I entered a test family with conventional planning and sufficient assets for a comfortable retirement. But the reports could not be produced because of a computation error below. It seems to be trying to compute consumption up to the age of 128 even though I entered max age of 99. Anyone seen this?
Log file contents:
LIQ:: Negative Consumption - Year: 128 cIdx: 1001 ERROR: Negative Consumption INFO: Planning Complete Sat Apr 27 09:37:40 2019 Copyright 2002-2019, Economic Security Planning, Inc. All Rights Reserved Opened Input File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\ESPB5C4.tmp Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\ESPB5C4.tmp Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\ESPB5C4. tmp.last Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\ESP_MAIN_REPORT. BIN Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\esp_main_report. xml Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\ ESP_DETAILED_REPORT.BIN Opened Output File: C:\Users\Owner\AppData\Local\Temp\esp_detailed_report. xml
CPU: 0.18750
Comments
dan royer
Sat, 04/27/2019 - 12:04
Permalink
I'd need to see the database
I'd need to see the database (use support ticket). Negative consumption sounds like simply an unaffordable model (which can easily happen if you guess wrong on the conventional planning). So I'd use economics planning to take advantage of the whole point of the program really--to find your sustainable spending level instead of having to guess at it. Conventional planning works better to prove the folly of conventional planning.
Dan
matt.cracker@gm...
Sat, 04/27/2019 - 12:11
Permalink
Dan, I'll put in a support
Dan, I'll put in a support ticket. I did have good results with economic planning and was checking the numbers with conventional.
Matt Graham
dan royer
Sat, 04/27/2019 - 12:13
Permalink
Sure. i'll watch for it.
Sure. i'll watch for it.